rel=canonical vs. 301 redirection

Discuss about latest seo trends and techniques.

Moderators: sendtogeo, hellow0rld, eugene

rel=canonical vs. 301 redirection

Postby weetechsolution » Mon Jan 15, 2018 5:24 am

It takes longer for Google to find the rel=canonical pages but 301 redirects seem to lose impact over time.
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 6:46 am

Re: rel=canonical vs. 301 redirection

Postby RHCalvin » Mon May 21, 2018 6:19 am

301 redirect is the most efficient and Search Engine Friendly method for webpage redirection. It's not that hard to implement and it should preserve your search engine rankings for that particular page. If you have to change file names or move pages around, it's the safest option. The code "301" is interpreted as "moved permanently".
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 6:31 am
Location: Forum

Re: rel=canonical vs. 301 redirection

Postby amar495 » Wed Jan 02, 2019 12:11 pm

it is always recommend to do 301 redirect for better seo.
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 9:43 am

Re: rel=canonical vs. 301 redirection

Postby Saravanan12 » Wed Jan 02, 2019 12:17 pm

Using a 301 redirect has a huge impact in preserving SEO juice. It prevents the existence of duplicate content.
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:32 am

Return to Seo Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests