Page 1 of 1
rel=canonical vs. 301 redirection
Posted:
Mon Jan 15, 2018 5:24 am
by weetechsolution
It takes longer for Google to find the rel=canonical pages but 301 redirects seem to lose impact over time.
Re: rel=canonical vs. 301 redirection
Posted:
Mon May 21, 2018 6:19 am
by RHCalvin
301 redirect is the most efficient and Search Engine Friendly method for webpage redirection. It's not that hard to implement and it should preserve your search engine rankings for that particular page. If you have to change file names or move pages around, it's the safest option. The code "301" is interpreted as "moved permanently".
Re: rel=canonical vs. 301 redirection
Posted:
Wed Jan 02, 2019 12:11 pm
by amar495
it is always recommend to do 301 redirect for better seo.
Re: rel=canonical vs. 301 redirection
Posted:
Wed Jan 02, 2019 12:17 pm
by Saravanan12
Using a 301 redirect has a huge impact in preserving SEO juice. It prevents the existence of duplicate content.